I was reading a post by this Grenade that got me thinking about younger women and older men. Hugh Hefner’s recent runaway bride aside, men seem to be blessed with the ability to wrangle in women younger than the kids that they had with their first wives. Why is this? The obvious answer would be women aren’t as shallow as men and are capable of being attracted by things not measured by Victoria’s Secret. To be fair to men, gravity definitely plays a role in this ideological rift. Large forms mounted horizontally are not meant to be held up forever. Unfortunately ladies, a temple can turn to ruins faster than a Harrison Ford flick.
But I don’t think men are that shallow across the board to explain why we can switch to a newer model more regularly than Steve Jobs. I think the fundamental reason we get younger women is because younger women allow it. Nobody’s holding a gun to their head saying “Make-out with you father’s golf buddy or else!” Maybe part of this is the fact that men can remain fertile much later into their lives. I kind of get how a younger woman would be intrigued by an older, wiser, financially stable man who also can still knock her up after his second knee replacement. If ovaries are as rare and valuable as a T206 Honus Wagner baseball card then sperm is like the bubble gum that came in every pack.
Really, the whole point of this post wasn’t to find an answer to why this phenomenon exists, but to express my conjecture on what I believe are the optimal ages for a man and woman in an intimate relationship when the fellow is twice the lady’s age.
I believer 54 and 27 are the ideal numbers based on a modified version of baseball sabermetrics I used.
Here’s why:
1. Any number over 60 for a guy is out because then you’re talking about a 3+ decade minimum age gap. Also, I’m not even 30 yet and it feels like I’ve been alive a long time. And they lived thru the Truman presidency, which was a decade before even JFK.
2. Obviously any age in the 30′s are out for guys, because that would make it illegal, creepy, or both.
3. The 40′s are a doable decade for guys but, other than college professors in that age range, most women half their age will be in college during that time frame and are probably going to put off settling down with an older guy until after they’ve explored the droves of young men teeming all around them.
So we’ve narrowed it down to the 50′s for guys. I choose 54 and 27 because at that point you’ve got a woman out of college who has turned the corner into her late 20′s but at the same time a guy who is still in his early 50′s. The women presumably has had a real world job for a few years and is financially independent and making decisions more on wants than needs. The man probably hasn’t had a heart attack yet and, because he’s a dude, probably still passes for someone in their late 40′s. If you’re 27 and he looks 48, that’s 6 years taken off the age gap right there. Subtract the years of virility the man has left ( let’s say 14 on average ) and now his age is down to 34. A 7 year age difference is negligible. It provides that perfect amount of time gap that allows a man to catch up in maturity to a woman.
I hope this was helpful to all my male chauvinist readers and to Hugh Hefner, if you’re reading old friend.












